Vistas de página la semana pasada

miércoles, 9 de agosto de 2017

What are some examples of technology being used incorrectly?

Nuclear Energy
Fossil fuels are running out at an alarming rate. For example, the world uses 3,948,000,000 U.S. gallons of oil per day or 94 million barrels. This oil took 10′s of millions of years to be created. Many experts predict we have reached Peak Oil (Maximum point of Oil Production) and are now seeing a decline. For some reason, people don’t seem to be worried that at our current rate of usage, our Oil reserves, which makes up 40.7% of today’s energy, will run out in less than 45 years (although this figure does not account for increase in population, increase in oil usage or increase in oil production). This is not only the case for oil, but also many other fossil fuels.
What is even worse is the negative effects of these fossil fuels. Processing these fossil fuels emits gases into the air (mainly Carbon Dioxide) which are harmful to the atmosphere. They damage the atmosphere causing global warming.
Another negative effect are oil spills. For example, the Deepwater Horizon Explosion, in an undersea BP oil well in the Gulf of Mexico is dubbed the worst environmental disaster in U.S. history. 11 workers were killed as roughly 4 billion barrels of oil were spilled. Roughly 82,000 birds, 6,165 sea turtles, and up to 25,900 marine mammals were killed.
Despite the negative effects of fossil fuels, especially Oil, the vast majority of the population are still unwilling to change to renewable energy, due to it’s disadvantages (too much initial fees, not efficient enough etc.) Here is where Nuclear energy could step in.
There is plenty of Uranium available for Nuclear Energy. We currently have 5.5 million metric tons of Uranium, along with 10.5 million metric tons currently undiscovered. We could likely power the world solely on Nuclear Energy for approximately 45 years. Although it is not yet economically viable, extracting Uranium from sea water could yield 4.5 billion metric tons of Uranium or 12,000 years worth of Energy supply!
Despite these facts, Nuclear Energy consumption is actually dropping, and only met 11.7% of world energy needs in 2011. The world only has 434 reactors operating.
Why isn’t Nuclear Energy used more?
Well here is where I finally get to answering the question (sorry for the long intro, it was necessary). Nuclear Energy was used wrongly, to horrible effects. The worst example is in Chernobyl.
On 26 April 1986, a level 7 (the Maximum rating) nuclear disaster occured on the International Nuclear Event scale. They had decided to schedule an experiment to test a new, potential safety emergency cooling feature. However it did not work as planned, as reactor four suffered a catastrophic power increase. This lead to explosions in the core of reactor four. The event has been blamed on the errors of the Power Plant Operators and structural damages, caused by negligence during construction. Either way it is clear that the event could have been avoided.
As a result of the explosion, 31 people were directly killed. It is predicted that 1,000 cases of Thyroid cancer and 4,000 cases of other cancers resulted from the radiation. Over 3,600,000 acres of land were rendered useless for production. The Soviet Union spent roughly 18 billion rubles on the disaster, causing severe economic consequences. Belarus is estimated to have spent $235 billion over the past 30 years on the disaster. It also obliterated many animals in the local environment
Events such as the Chernobyl disaster show how Nuclear Energy, which could have been so useful in today’s world, has been utilised wrongly. It has also been used in Nuclear bombs, further staining it’s image. If used correctly, it could be a solution to many of our problems. Unfortunately, due to it’s incorrect implementation, we have to face these horrific disasters instead.
Sources :  
EDIT : A number of people have talked about Thorium and how its safer than uranium. At the time of writing this answer, I was not aware of the vast supplies of Thorium and I believed that it was a rare resource. I would like to add now that Thorium would actually be a superior alternative to Uranium

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario